Find more posts

Empty Homes Premium - many authorities opt out

Latest
March 18, 2014
Analysis of the recently-released final figures for the October 2013 Council Taxbase return show no fewer than 86 local authorities from across the country opting out of the Empty Homes Premium (which can be levied on homes vacant for over two years). The 86 authorities (listed at the end of the article) are scattered across the country and there seems to be no common feature to distinguishe them from those that have declined to use the EHP measure. Of those that have decided to charge Empty Homes Premium, one has opted for 10%, two have opted for 25% and the rest have opted for 50% (the maximum allowable). The authorities with the most homes subject to EHP are, predictably, large regional cities. Six have over 1,000 of 2-year-plus empties:
  • Bradford 1,522
  • Birmingham 1,519
  • Liverpool 1,510
  • Durham UA 1,280
  • Manchester 1,245
  • Leeds 1,112
In all there are 56,055 homes that have been empty for over two years and are subject to the premium. But the authorities that have opted out include places such as Westminster, Calderdale, Stoke-on-Trent and Pendle - all of which could be expected to have a large number of two-year plus empties. The total figure would be a good deal higher if all authorities had imposed the charge. Anecdotally, the Empty Homes Premium has been effective in getting previously disengaged owners to engage - or simply to get on with bringing their homes back into use of their own volition. But some leading-light authorities such as Stoke and Amber Valley, widely known to be proactive and creative, have not pursued the measure. Presumably some of the low-demand authorities such as Pendle have concluded that their housing markets are so dysfunctional that it would be unfair to impose the premium. At the other end of the scale, authorities such as Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Kingston upon Thames, Cheltenham and the like may have had political reasons for not introducing the charge, such as not wanting to frighten off rich people who have a penchant for leaving their homes empty. Amongst those authorities charging EHP the median number of longer-term empties is 151. You can download the full dataset from our library here. This is for Full Members only so you'll need to be logged in to access it. Authorities not charging Empty Homes Premium
  • Amber Valley
  • Basildon
  • Blaby
  • Blackpool
  • Bolsover
  • Braintree
  • Brentwood
  • Bromley
  • Bromsgrove
  • Broxbourne
  • Calderdale
  • Canterbury
  • Carlisle
  • Castle Point
  • Charnwood
  • Cheltenham
  • Cherwell
  • Chichester
  • Chiltern
  • City of London
  • Cotswold
  • Dacorum
  • Daventry
  • Derbyshire Dales
  • Dover
  • Dudley
  • East Hertfordshire
  • East Staffordshire
  • Forest of Dean
  • Fylde
  • Gateshead
  • Gloucester
  • Gosport
  • Hambleton
  • Hammersmith and Fulham
  • Harborough
  • Harlow
  • Hart
  • Havering
  • Herefordshire
  • Hillingdon
  • Hinckley and Bosworth
  • Isles of Scilly
  • Kensington and Chelsea
  • Kingston upon Thames
  • Maidstone
  • Mansfield
  • Medway
  • Merton
  • Milton Keynes
  • New Forest
  • North East Derbyshire
  • North Lincolnshire
  • North Somerset
  • North Tyneside
  • North West Leicestershire
  • Pendle
  • Redditch
  • Ribble Valley
  • Richmondshire
  • Rochford
  • Rossendale
  • Rushcliffe
  • Selby
  • Shepway
  • Shropshire UA
  • Slough
  • South Bucks
  • South Northamptonshire
  • South Ribble
  • South Tyneside
  • Stevenage
  • Stoke-on-Trent
  • Stroud
  • Swale
  • Tendring
  • Tewkesbury
  • Thanet
  • Tonbridge and Malling
  • Uttlesford
  • Warrington
  • West Oxfordshire
  • Westminster
  • Wiltshire UA
  • Winchester
  • Wyre
  • Wyre Forest